AI Transparency Card Toolkit: Score Your Work and Generate a Disclosure Card

Before you start

How deep an assessment do you want?

Both routes produce a real disclosure. The simple one is enough for most work, and the full one exists for work where a formal declaration is warranted.

The old ruler. It asks for a percentage rather than per activity answers, and its result offers the four frozen formats. Use it only to keep a series consistent.

Result · assessment complete

Publish this disclosure

Position on the scale

How the points were earned

One more fact, no effect on the score

Was this reviewed by a person before publication?

Reviewed AI content and unreviewed AI content are different things and a reader would want to know which they are holding. Who checked something is a separate question from what produced it, so this never moves the band, the points or the code.

Disclosure code

Declaration required · ratio equals one

Every activity was AI led

Your answers put the ratio at exactly one, and the graded scale stops short of one. This belongs to no band, so the builder will not assign one.

What your answers describe is the AI Generated declaration. It sits above band E, outside the graded scale, and it is reached by declaring it rather than by calculation. Declaring is a human act and remains one.

Declaring issues a card of a different kind. It carries the claim, the code, your name and the date, and it carries no points and no position on the scale, because none were earned. It is not band E and no surface will present it as one.

Your answers are kept with the record so the declaration can be reviewed later. They are not published as a score and no card displays them.

If you do not declare, revise an answer. Under no circumstance is the ratio rounded into band E to avoid this step.

Coverage signal · no band

You said AI was involved, and then that you did every activity yourself

That is a contradiction with two possible causes, and scoring cannot tell them apart. So it will not choose.

01
You meant to declare no AI involvement
Resolved by declaring TM-NONE. Go back to the gate and answer no.
02
AI was used in a way this medium's activity list does not cover
That is a signal about the medium definition rather than about your work. These are the activities this medium covers:

A coverage signal carries no band, no points, no code and no outcome. Recording one leaves the score unchanged. It is not a smaller disclosure and no surface may treat it as one.

Disclosure

Five ways to publish it. Choose one.

The same assessment, written out. A written disclosure in a caption is a real disclosure rather than a smaller one.

Download PDF

HTML embed

The card is served by the framework and drawn inside an iframe, so nothing in your own stylesheet can change what it says.

Before you paste this

The address in this code is where the framework publishes cards, and it answers once the framework moves to it. Paste it before then and the card will not draw. Nothing about the code changes when it does, so it is worth keeping rather than reissuing.

What every one of these carries

Renderings of one assessment, not several assessments. Every one carries the band name, the medium, the points as a fraction, and the code with its version. None carries a percentage, a ratio or a breadth figure.

How deep an assessment do you want?

Was this reviewed by a person before publication?

Every activity was AI led

You said AI was involved, and then that you did every activity yourself

You meant to declare no AI involvement

AI was used in a way this medium's activity list does not cover

Five ways to publish it. Choose one.