AI Organisational Wellbeing Instrument
A structured periodic reflection for organisations using AI, examining impact on the human conditions that determine whether a team can sustain healthy, meaningful and effective work over time.
Sustained productivity depends on organisational health. This instrument does not measure what AI produced. It examines what AI has changed for the people doing the work -- and whether those changes are making the organisation a healthier or more difficult place to operate in. The productivity argument follows from that.
Version:v0.2 beta
Pillars:5
Questions:15 scenario-based
Grounding:Job Demands-Resources model (Bakker & Demerouti)
Who is completing this?
This instrument has two versions, one for individual staff and one for managers. The questions are the same, but the framing differs, and the results are interpreted differently. Choose the version that fits your situation before you begin.
Set the context
Define what this assessment covers. This shapes how results are interpreted and how the disclosure code is formed.
A name for this period, e.g. Q1 2026 or Year 1. Used in your benchmark view.
Please select a scope and review period before continuing.
Pillar detail
Your wellbeing disclosure code
Save this code. If your organisation collects wellbeing data, submit it through whatever confidential channel has been set up: for example, an anonymous quarterly form. Your name should never be attached to it. The code format is: [scope]-[period] then each pillar code and score (-6 to +6). Negative values indicate areas where AI use is contributing to strain.
Help shape this instrument
We are actively looking for organisations and individuals who want to improve and validate this instrument. Your experience (what worked, what did not, what was missing) directly shapes the next version. This is an open invitation.
Add a period